Saturday, July 4, 2026

Supreme Court Begins Hearing On Appeal Of Kano Singer Sentenced To Death For Blasphemy

Olayiwola Matthew

The Supreme Court has commenced proceedings on the appeal filed by Yahaya Sharif-Aminu, the Kano-based singer sentenced to death by hanging for alleged blasphemy against Prophet Mohammed.

The case, which came up on Thursday at the apex court, marks a critical stage in a legal battle that has drawn national and international attention since 2020.

THE ALLEGED OFFENCE

Sharif-Aminu’s ordeal began on March 4, 2020, when he circulated a song via WhatsApp. The lyrics were deemed offensive and blasphemous against Prophet Muhammad.

Following public outrage, protesters stormed his family house in Kano and set it ablaze while demanding his arrest. He was subsequently taken into custody by the Hisbah police in Kano.

THE JUDGMENT AND APPEALS

On August 10, 2020, an upper sharia court in Hausawa Filin Hockey area of Kano convicted Sharif-Aminu and sentenced him to death by hanging.

The singer did not deny the charges at the trial. Aliyu Muhammad Kani, the trial judge, informed him of his right to appeal the ruling.

The judgment sparked outrage across social media platforms, with many groups raising concerns about freedom of expression and fair trial standards.

Displeased with the verdict, Sharif-Aminu approached the Kano state high court.

On January 21, 2021, the high court quashed his conviction on the grounds that he was denied legal representation at the sharia court. However, it ordered that he face a fresh trial before another sharia court.

Not satisfied with the order for retrial, Sharif-Aminu appealed to the court of appeal in Kano, arguing that since the original conviction was nullified, he should have been acquitted and discharged.

The appellate court, in a majority decision, upheld the retrial order, ruling that it was lawful and in the interest of justice.

The majority judgment further held that the Kano State Sharia Penal Code Law 2000, under which Sharif-Aminu was convicted, was not unconstitutional.

A minority decision disagreed, arguing that the singer ought to have been discharged once the initial trial was declared invalid.

The singer then proceeded to the supreme court to challenge the appellate court’s ruling.

Hot this week

Access Holdings and Coronation Group Celebrate Enduring Legacy of Nigerian Modernism

Access Holdings Plc and Coronation Group hosted a private...

How “Fake Agency’ secures office Space thru SGF

Official documents exclusively obtained by Saturday PUNCH have cast...

Atiku vows 2027 fight as court clears Mark-led ADC

The Federal High Court, Abuja on Thursday affirmed David...

World Cup: Ronaldo scores as Portugal beat Croatia 2-1 to reach last 16

Portugal battled into the last 16 of the World...

Arbeloa Confirms Real Madrid Exit; Mourinho Emerges Leading Replacement

Álvaro Arbeloa has confirmed his departure from Real Madrid...

Topics

Access Holdings and Coronation Group Celebrate Enduring Legacy of Nigerian Modernism

Access Holdings Plc and Coronation Group hosted a private...

How “Fake Agency’ secures office Space thru SGF

Official documents exclusively obtained by Saturday PUNCH have cast...

Atiku vows 2027 fight as court clears Mark-led ADC

The Federal High Court, Abuja on Thursday affirmed David...

World Cup: Ronaldo scores as Portugal beat Croatia 2-1 to reach last 16

Portugal battled into the last 16 of the World...

Arbeloa Confirms Real Madrid Exit; Mourinho Emerges Leading Replacement

Álvaro Arbeloa has confirmed his departure from Real Madrid...

Super Eagles Players Who Won Trophies This Season

The 2025/2026 season ended on a high note for...

Coaches With The Highest Trophies With A Premier League Club

From Manchester United to Manchester City and Arsenal, the...

Pep Guardiola Confirms Man City Exit At End Of Season

Pep Guardiola announced on Friday that he will leave...
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img